王国旗;徐韬;盛伟斌;李京;袁春晓;杨新明;

• 1:新疆医科大学第一附属医院脊柱外科

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]系统评价椎管成形术与前路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效与安全性。[方法]计算机检索Cochrane图书馆(2013年第5期)、PubMed(1966年~2013年5月)、OVID(1950年~2013年5月)、EMbase(1966年~2013年5月)、中国生物医学文献数据库(1978年~2013年5月)、万方数据库(1998年~2013年5月)、中国期刊全文数据库(1999年~2013年5月),手工检索《中华外科杂志》等5种相关杂志,收集椎管成形术与前路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病疗效与安全性的随机或半随机对照试验,由两名评价者按纳入与排除标准选择试验、提取资料和质量评价后,采用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析。[结果]最终纳入8个对照试验,共580例患者。Meta分析结果显示:椎管成形术与前路手术的术后并发症发生率[OR=0.25,95%CI(0.13,0.45),P<0.00001]、邻近节段退变发生率[OR=0.17,95%CI(0.04,0.68),P=0.01]、再手术率[OR=0.14,95%CI(0.05,0.45),P=0.000 8]、手术时间[WMD=-64.62,95%CI(-74.48,-54.75),P<0.000 01]和术中出血量[WMD=-192.71,95%CI(-224.77,-160.65),P<0.000 01]的差异有统计学意义;而两组术前JOA评分[WMD=-0.17,95%CI(-0.53,0.18),P=0.34]、术后JOA评分[WMD=-0.28,95%CI(-0.91,0.36),P=0.39]、神经功能改善率[WMD=-4.42,95%CI(-12.09,3.25),P=0.26]和颈椎活动度[WMD=-3.08,95%CI(-13.44,7.28),P=0.56]的差异无统计学意义。[结论]椎管成形术与前路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病,脊髓神经功能的改善无显著不同;但椎管成形术具有手术时间短,术中出血量少,术后并发症发生率、临近节段退变发生率和再手术率低等优点。

关键词(KeyWords)： 脊髓型颈椎病;椎管成形术;前路手术;Meta分析;系统评价

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 王国旗;徐韬;盛伟斌;李京;袁春晓;杨新明;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]廖心远,陈德玉,陈宇,等.多节段脊髓型颈椎病的手术治疗进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,1:73-76.
• [2]Guo Q,Bi X,Ni B,et al.Outcomes of three anterior decompression and fusion techniques in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylosis[J].Europ Spine J,2011,9:1539-1544.
• [3]Wells G,Shea B,O’Connell D,et al.The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale(Nos)for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in metaanalyses[EB/OL].www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
• [4]Edwards CCII,Heller JGMD,Murakami HMD.Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy:an independent matched-cohort analysis.[Miscellaneous Article][J].Spine J,2002,11:1168-1175.
• [5]Hirai T,Okawa A,Arai Y,et al.Middle-term results of a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011,23:1940-1947.
• [6]Liu T,Yang HL,Xu YZ,et al.Acdf with the pcb cage-plate system versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2011,4:213-220.
• [7]Seng C,Tow BP,Siddiqui MA,et al.Surgically treated cervical myelopathy:a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty[J].Spine J,2013:1-9.
• [8]Shibuya S,Komatsubara S,Oka S,et al.Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spinal Cord,2010,3:214-220.
• [9]Wada E,Suzuki S,Kanazawa A,et al.Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy:a longterm follow-up study over 10 years[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,13:1443-1447,1448.
• [10]Yonenobu K,Hosono N,Iwasaki M,et al.Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy.A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1992,11:1281-1284.
• [11]刘艳兵,申勇,杨大龙,等.三种手术方法治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,19:1462-1465.
• [12]陈耀龙,李幼平,杜亮,等.医学研究中证据分级和推荐强度的演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2008,2:127-133.
• [13]蒋继乐,董健.多节段颈椎退变性疾病手术方式的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志,2011,12:1382-1386.
• [14]盛伟斌,刘忠军,华强,等.同种异体骨在脊髓型颈椎病椎体次全切除减压融合术中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2004,19:1174-1177.
• [15]Kabir SM,Alabi J,Rezajooi K,et al.Anterior cervical corpectomy:review and comparison of results using titanium mesh cages and carbon fibre reinforced polymer cages[J].Br J Neurosurg,2010,5:542-546.
• [16]陈德玉,贾连顺,赵定麟,等.颈椎病前路减压术后再手术[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,3:134-137.