颈后路椎管扩大减压微型钛板固定椎板成形术与传统颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大减压术治疗颈椎病的比较研究Comparison of operative result of using of titanium miniplate in cervical expansive open- door laminoplasty with conventional cervical expansive open- door laminoplasty in treating multi- segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy
韦敏克;尹东;梁斌;丘德赞;韦建勋;欧裕福;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]比较观察研究颈后路椎管扩大减压微型钛板固定椎板成形术与传统颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大减压术治疗颈椎病的临床疗效。[方法]回顾分析32例脊髓型颈椎病患者的临床资料,按手术方式随机分为2组,其中观察组为微型钛板组16例,对照组为传统单开门组16例,对比分析两组患者手术情况、术后症状改善情况JOA评分,末次随访术后椎板开门角度,术后测量颈椎曲度(颈椎侧位X线片上C2与C7椎体后壁切线之间夹角)的改变,以及轴性症状发生率,观察手术时间、术中出血量对比情况。[结果]经术后6个月~2年的随访,微型钛板固定组术后6个月JOA评分改善率为60.5%±17.0%,传统单开门组为58.2%±9.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。微型钛板固定组末次随访时椎板开门角度为(42.3±3.5)°,传统单开门组为(39.5±4.1)°,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。微型钛板固定组术后6个月颈椎曲度为(18.5±4.8)°,与术前(18.2±4.8)°比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);传统单开门组术后6个月颈椎曲度为(16.9±5.6)°,与术前(19.5±6.2)°比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);微型钛板固定组术后6个月轴性症状发生率为4/16,明显低于传统单开门组的9/16,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者无1例出现C5神经根麻痹。[结论]颈后路椎管扩大减压微型钛板固定椎板成形术和传统颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大减压术均是治疗脊髓型颈椎病的有效方法,但颈后路椎管扩大减压微型钛板固定椎板成形术更有效防止单开门椎管扩大椎板成形术后再关门,减少术后轴性症状的发生率和颈椎曲度的丢失,是治疗颈椎病的一种理想手术方式。
关键词(KeyWords): 颈椎病;椎管扩大椎板成形术;单开门;微型钛板
基金项目(Foundation): 广西壮族自治区卫生厅计划课题资助项目(编号:桂卫Z2013335)
作者(Author): 韦敏克;尹东;梁斌;丘德赞;韦建勋;欧裕福;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Matsumoto M,Watanabe K,Tsuji T,et al.Risk factors for closure of lamina after open-door laminoplasty[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2008,9:530-537.
- [2]O Brien MF,Peterson D,Casey ATH,et al.A novel technique for laminop last 3 augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization:a computerized morphometrie analysis[J].Spine,1996,21:474-483.
- [3]Park AE,Heller JG.Cervical laminoplasty:use of a novel titaniumplate to maintain canal expansion-surgical technique[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2004,17:265-271.
- [4]Hirabayashi K,Watanabe K,Wakano K,et al.Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy[J].Spine,1983,8:693-699.
- [5]Yang SC,Yu SW,Tu YK,et al.Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation forcervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20:492-498.
- [6]John MR,Bradley R.Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures[J].Spine,2010,36:9-14.
- [7]Tani S,Suetsua F,Mizuno J,et al.New titanium spacer for cervical laminoplasty:initialclinical experience[J].Technical Note Neurol Med Hir,2010,50:132-136.
- [8]李雷,王欢,崔少千,等.重建后方韧带复合体的颈椎单开门桥式植骨椎板成形术对术后轴性症状和颈椎曲度的影响[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2007,21:457-460.
- [9]Kawaguchi Y,Matsui H,Ishihara H,et al.Axial symptoms after aebloc cervical laminoplasty[J].J Spinal Disord,1999,12:392-395.
- [10]陈广东,杨惠林,王根林,等.微型钛板在颈椎单开门椎管扩大椎板成形术中的应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20:850-854.
- [11]张学利,夏英鹏,贾宇涛,等.FASTIN锚钉在颈椎单开门椎管成形术中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17:256-259.
- [12]刘艳兵,申勇,杨大龙,等.三种手术方法治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,19:1462-1465.
- [13]Freedman B,Heller J,Rhee J.Cervical laminoplasty myths and realities:a Meta-analysis of outeomes and complications[J].Spine J,2009,1:23-26.
- [14]曾岩,党耕町,马庆军.颈椎前路融合术后颈部运动功能的评价[J].中华外科杂志,2004,24:1481-1484.
- [15]Park A,Heller J.Cervical laminoplasty:use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion surgical technique[J].Spinal Disord Tech,2004,4:265-271.