不同容量骨水泥用于经皮穿刺椎体成形术的疗效评价
刘伟;郑君涛;马原;田慧中;
摘要(Abstract)：
[目的]探讨两种容量骨水泥治疗老年胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。[方法]自2008年10月~2010年10月,对62例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者分别行3 ml和5 ml骨水泥注射,将患者随机分为两组(A组为3 ml组30例,B组为5 ml组32例),分别测量手术前后疼痛行VAS评分,观察术后并发症及术后两组的疗效差异。[结果]所有患者术后疼痛明显缓解或消失,其中A组VAS评分术后缓解(1.65±0.70)分;B组VAS评分术后缓解(1.55±0.60)分,两组比较P>0.05,差别无统计意义。[结论]针对老年胸腰椎骨折特点,无论是采用3 ml或者5 ml骨水泥行经皮穿刺椎体成形术,均可迅速缓解疼痛,能显著改善愈合,两者疗效无明显差异性。
关键词(KeyWords)： 容量;骨水泥;经皮穿刺椎体成形术
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 刘伟;郑君涛;马原;田慧中;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References)：
- [1]Layton KF,Thielen KR,Koch CA,et al.Vertebroplasty,first1000 lev-els of asingle center:evaluation of the outcomes and complications[J].Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28:683-689.
- [2]Diamond TH,Champion B,Clark WA.Management of acute osteopo-rotic vertebral fractures:a non-randomized trial comparing percutane-ous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy[J].Am J Med,2003,114:257-265.
- [3]Diamond TH,Bryant C,Browne L,et al.Clinical outcomes after acuteosteoporotic vertebral fractures:a 2-year non-randomised trial compa-ring percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy[J].Med JAust,2006,184:113-117.
- [4]Alvarez L,Alcaraz M,Pe'rez-Higueras A,et al.Percutaneous vertebro-plasty:functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compres-sion fractures[J].Spine,2006,31:1113-1118.
- [5]Galibert P,Deramond H,Rosat P,et al.Preliminary note on the treat-ment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty[J].JNeurochimr Gie,1987,33:166-168.
- [6]黄承军,唐福宇,娄宇明,等.经皮椎体成形术并发症分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,18:1374-1376.
- [7]杜靖远.椎体成形术和后凸成形术-过去、现在和未来[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,12:941-943.
- [8]滕海军,周跃.椎体成形术和后凸成形术[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17:431-434.
- [9]Cotten A,Boutry N,Cortet B,et al.Percutaneous vertebroplasty:stateof the art[J].Radiographics,1998,2:311-320.