邻近椎体新发骨折的保守与PVP治疗比较Conservative therapy versus percutaneous vertebroplasty again for adjacent new fractures after primary vertebroplasty
曾庆虎;彭成忠;吴财;王乐乐;廖涛;曾钊;张勇军;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]比较椎体成形术(PVP)后邻近椎体新发骨折保守治疗与再次PVP的疗效。[方法]回顾性研究2015年8月~2018年8月在本院骨科因骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折行PVP术后95例邻近椎体新发骨折的患者,采用保守治疗32例,PVP再手术63例,采用VAS和ODI评分评价临床效果,拍摄X线片,测量局部后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘压缩比。[结果]随时间推移,两组患者的VAS评分及ODI指数均显著降低(P<0.05)。治疗前两组患者间VAS和ODI评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后1周和1个月时,手术组的VAS和ODI评分均显著低于保守组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后3、6个月时,手术组的VAS和ODI评分仍均低于保守组,但差异已无统计学意义(P>0.05)。保守组患者治疗前后局部后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘压缩率无显著变化(P>0.05);手术组术后各时间点局部后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘压缩率均较术前显著减少,差异有统计学(P<0.05)。治疗前两组间局部后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘压缩率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而治疗后各时间点,手术组的局部后凸Cobb角和椎体前缘压缩率均显著小于保守组(P<0.05)。[结论]与保守治疗相比,再次PVP手术治疗可更有效、迅速恢复经皮椎体成形术后邻近椎体新发骨折患者自主生活能力,并能够一定程度纠正脊柱后凸畸形,恢复脊柱力线。
关键词(KeyWords): 骨质疏松性椎骨压缩骨折(OVCFs);经皮椎体成形术(PVP);邻近椎体新发骨折;保守治疗
基金项目(Foundation): 湖南省教育厅一般基金项目(编号:12C0207)
作者(Author): 曾庆虎;彭成忠;吴财;王乐乐;廖涛;曾钊;张勇军;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]袁义明,李玉民,张体栋.单侧穿刺骨水泥定向注射治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性骨折[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2018, 26(6):27-30.
- [2] Sun HB, Jing XS, Liu YZ, et al. The optimal volume fraction in percutaneous vertebroplasty evaluated by pain relief, cement dispersion, and cement leakage:a prospective cohort study of 130 patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the thoracolumbar vertebra[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 114(6):677-688.
- [3] Senturk Salim, Goktug A,ünsalülkününlü, et al. Minimally invasive translaminar endoscopic approach to percutaneous vertebroplasty cement leakage:technical note[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,117(1):15-19.
- [4] Chen LH, Hsieh MK, Liao JC, et al. Repeated percutaneous vertebroplasty for refracture of cemented vertebrae[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2011, 131(7):927-933.
- [5]胡乐,王静成,王永祥,等. PVP术中骨水泥注射率与术后邻近椎体骨折的关系[J].实用骨科杂志, 2018, 24(3):211-214.
- [6] Fu ZZ, Chen ZX, Qin Y, et al. Low cement distribution index is a risk factor for refracture of the adjacent segments after percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. J Southern Med Univ, 2017, 37(7):947-951.
- [7] Lee DG, Park CK, Park CJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors causing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral compressionfractures:a 4-year follow-up[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015, 28(10):578-583.
- [8]李康,王诗尧,许少策,等.中国人群PVP术后非手术椎体骨折的危险因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2018, 28(9):801-810.
- [9] Seo DH, Oh SH, Yoon KW, et al. Risk factors of new adjacent compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty:effectiveness of bisphosphonate in osteoporotic or osteopenic elderly patients[J]. Korean J Neurotrauma, 2014, 10(2):86-91.
- [10]王楠,许建柱,陈恩良,等.经皮椎弓根螺钉结合椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰段骨折[J].中国骨伤, 2018, 31(4):339-346.
- [11] Filippiadis DK, Marcia S, Masala S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty:current status, new developments and old controversies[J]. CardioVascular Int Radiol, 2017, 40:1815-1823.
- [12] Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures:long-term evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2011,196(6):1415-1418.
- [13]李国富,林子庆,聂友根.骨质疏松症压缩性骨折患者PVP/PKP术后远期病椎及邻近椎体新发骨折发生率比较[J].临床医学工程, 2018, 25(2):201-202.
- [14] Takahara K, Kamimura M, Moriya H, et al. Risk factors of adjacent vertebral collapse after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016, 17(1):1-7.
- [15] Li H, Yang DL, Ma L, et al. Risk factors associated with adjacent vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebroplasty after menopause:a retrospective study[J]. Med Sci Monit,2017, 23(11):5271-5276.