生物型FHR与PFNA治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折疗效观察Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus biological artificial femoral head replacement for femoral intertro-chanteric fracture in the elderly
周胜虎;甄平;李旭升;沈伟伟;刘军;李生贵;常彦峰;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]探讨生物型人工股骨头置换(femoral head replacement,FHR)与股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。[方法]2008年3月~2012年12月对108例高龄粗隆间骨折患者实施手术治疗。男63例,女45例;平均年龄83.72岁(75~99岁)。所有患者术前常规行骨密度检测,骨折均行Evens-Jensen分型,随机分为生物型FHR组47例及PFNA组61例。比较两组患者手术时间、出血量、下床时间、住院时间、Harris评分及深静脉血栓、肺部及泌尿系感染等情况。[结果]所有患者术后均获12~36个月随访,平均(28.04±6.32)个月。平均手术时间:PFNA组(53.73±15.22)min,FHR组(77.50±16.83)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平均术中出血量:PFNA组(132.51±33.21)ml,FHR组(286.34±43.23)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后下床锻炼时间:PFNA组平均(12.24±3.72)d,FHR组平均(3.12±1.23)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。平均住院时间:PFNA组(7.60±1.83)d,FHR组(6.84±2.24)d,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1年髋关节功能Harris评分:PFNA组(87.71±7.92)分,FHR组(88.31±9.21)分,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后并发症两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]FHR与PFNA是治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折安全有效的内固定方式,均可获得良好的髋关节功能,但应严格掌握手术适应证,合理选择最佳有效的手术方式。
关键词(KeyWords): 股骨粗隆间骨折;高龄;股骨近端抗旋转髓内钉;人工股骨头置换术
基金项目(Foundation): 甘肃省科技计划项目(编号:1208RJZA108);; 全军医药卫生基金课题(编号:CLZ12JAO7)
作者(Author): 周胜虎;甄平;李旭升;沈伟伟;刘军;李生贵;常彦峰;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Le Blanc ES,Hillier TA,Pedula KL.Hip fracture and increased short-term but not long-term mortality in healthy older women[J].Arch Int Med,2011,171(20):1831-1837.
- [2]Kim SH,Meehan JP,Lee MA.Surgical treatment of trochanteric and cervical hip fractures in the United States:2000-2009[J].J Arthroplasty,2013,28(8):1386-1390.
- [3]Feehan LM,Tang CS,Oxland TR.Early controlled passive motion improves early fracture alignment and structural properties in a closed extra-articular meta-carpal fracture in a rabbit modle[J].J Hand Surg Am,2007,32(2):200-208.
- [4]Jensen JS,Michaelsen M.Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with Mclaughlin osteosynthesis[J].Acta Orthop Scand,1975,46(5):795-803.
- [5]李龙付,李关兴,夏修海,等.股骨髓腔的解剖学测量及与股骨交锁髓内钉的匹配性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(6):565-569.
- [6]李世民,党耕町.临床骨科学[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1998:328.
- [7]Gaumetou E,Zilber S,Hernigou P.Non-simultaneous bilateral hip fracture:epidemiologic study of 241 hip fractures[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2011,97(1):22-27.
- [8]Han SK,Lee BY,Kim YS,et al.Usefulness of multi-detector CT in Boyd-Griffin type 2 intertrochanteric fractures with clinical correlation[J].Skeletal Radiol,2010,39(6):543-549.
- [9]孔长庚,张寿.股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(4):379-381.
- [10]章暐,邹剑,罗从风,等.股骨近端髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨转子间及转子下骨折的比较研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):649-652.
- [11]Setiobudi T,Ng YH,Lim CT,et al.Clinical outcome following treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with dynamic hip screw[J].Ann Acad Med Singapore,2011,40(11):482-487.
- [12]Li J,Chen JK,Zhou K,et al.Application of dynamic hip screw with modified reamer in intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly[J].Zhongguo Gushang,2011,24(5):362-365.
- [13]黄成国,叶君健.3种不同方式治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的病例对照试验[J].中国骨伤,2012,25(7):549-553.
- [14]陈建松,郑强,李杭,等.动力髋部螺钉和股骨近端髓内钉治疗高龄患者股骨转子间骨折的比较[J].浙江医学,2008,30(1):49.
- [15]Papasimos S,Koutsojannis CM,Panagopoulos A,et al.A randomised comparison of AMBI,TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fracture[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2005,125(7):462-468.
- [16]Boldin C,Seibert FJ,Fankhauser F,et al.Proximal femoral nail(PFN)-a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fracture:a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15months[J].Acta orthop Scand,2003,74(1):53-58.
- [17]李长民,李爱民.人工双极股骨头置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2009,12(1):53-55.
- [18]胡艳辉,向川,段王平.高龄股骨转子间骨折三种手术方法的临床疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节外科杂志,2012,5(6):461-465.
- [19]Choy WS,Ahn JH,Ko JH,et al.Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients[J].Clin Orthop Surg,2010,2(4):221-226
- [20]孙维国,李皓桓,彭飞,等.采用Wagner假体行人工股骨头置换治疗高龄股骨粗隆间不稳定骨折的疗效观察[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2014,35(4):613-616.
- [21]邱贵兴,吴志宏,沈建雄,等.阿仑磷酸钠治疗伴骨质疏松症的髋部骨折[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(6):347-350.