前路与后路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的比较Anterior versus posterior surgeries for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy
井龙飞;罗绪建;丛琳;梁德勇;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]探讨颈椎前路椎体次全切植骨融合内固定术和后路单开门椎管扩大成形术两种手术方式的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2014年1月~2016年12月本院60例多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者,按照手术方式的不同分为前路椎体次全切植骨融合内固定术组(前路组)和后路单开门椎管扩大成形术组(后路组),记录分析两组的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后并发症发生率,并根据改良JOA评分对比分析两组的临床疗效。[结果]前路组的手术时间明显长于后路组、术中失血量大于后路组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组间在住院时间及并发症发生率的差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。前路组与后路组的JOA评分均随术后时间延长而显著增加,由术前的[(9.27±2.05)vs(9.43±2.46)],增加至术后1周的[(18.63±1.87)vs(17.80±1.65)],术后12周的[(21.50±1.38)vs(20.80±1.58)],进一步增加至术后24周的[(23.63±1.27)vs(22.97±1.77)],两组不同时间点间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但相同时间点两组间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。末次随访时两组的结果优良率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]前路手术及后路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病都可明显改善神经功能,后路手术时间短,术中出血量少。
关键词(KeyWords): 多节段脊髓型颈椎病;前路椎体次全切植骨融合内固定术;单开门椎管扩大成形术
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 井龙飞;罗绪建;丛琳;梁德勇;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Boogaarts HD.Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Eur Spine J,2015,24(2):139-141.
- [2]何国雄,欧光信,李文锐,等.颈椎前路潜行减压植骨融合术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病32例[J].海南医学,2013,24(4):551-553.
- [3]Tetreault L.A systematic review of clinical and surgical predictors of complications following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2016,24(1):77-99.
- [4]Zhu B,Xu YL,Liu XG,et al.Anterior approach versus posterior approach for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myeolopathy:a systemic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(7):1583-1593.
- [5]Uribe JS,Reddy J,Duckworth E,et al.Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction:analysis of outcome and longterm follow-up[J].Eur Spine J,2009,18(5):654-662.
- [6]薛威.两种手术减压方式对多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效分析[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(3):125-126.
- [7]陈文恒.双节段ACDF和单节段ACCF手术治疗脊髓型颈椎病疗效比较[J].实用骨科杂志,2017,23(2):100-104.
- [8]梁和胜.颈椎后路单开门与双开门椎管扩大修复多节段脊髓型颈椎病:颈椎活动度对比[J].中国组织工程研究,2016,20(22):3235-3241.
- [9]Guo QF,Bi XD,Ni B,et al.Outcomes of three anterior decompression and fusion techniques in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylosis[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(9):1539-1544.
- [10]马航展.颈椎前路手术中后纵韧带切除与否的临床探讨[J].实用医学杂志,2016,32(5):786-789.
- [11]An HS,Alshihabi L,Kurd M.Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2014,22(7):420-429.
- [12]Highsmith Jason M,Dhall Sanjay S,Haid Regis W,et al.Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy:a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2011,14(5):619-625.
- [13]游景扬,郑勇,陈明,等.颈椎前路与后路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病疗效的Meta分析[J].中国骨伤,2017,30(1):71-78.
- [14]陈朦村.脊髓型颈椎病的手术方案选择[J].临床骨科杂志,2014,17(5):608-613.
- [15]Machino M,Yukawa Y,Ito K,et al.Risk factors for poor outcome of cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with diabetes[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(24):2049-2055.