徐用亿;王守国;孙进;谢跃;费昊东;季峰;葛运如;

• 1:南京医科大学附属淮安一院

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]比较分析治疗多节段颈椎病前路不同减压植骨融合术式的临床疗效,探讨如何选择多节段颈椎病的前路减压植骨融合术式。[方法]回顾性分析本院2004年1月~2013年1月采用颈前路不同减压术式治疗的85例多节段颈椎病患者资料。根据手术方式分三组:长节段椎体次全切除减压A组25例,多平面椎间隙减压B组30例,椎体次全切除结合椎间隙减压C组30例,比较分析三组手术时间、术中出血量、术后的JOA评分改善优良率、颈椎曲度Cobb角、融合率及并发症率等。[结果]所有患者均获得至少2年随访,平均手术时间[分别为(158.80±28.55)min,(164.67±24.24)min,(142.5±26.51)min]C组与A、B组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);平均出血量[分别为(264.86±84.80)ml,(203.33±83.34)ml,(211.67±76.21)ml]A组与B、C组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后JOA评分改善优良率和并发症率三组之间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。融合率(3组分别为60%,83.33%,90%),A组与C组之间比较差异有统计学意义。术后1年颈椎Cobb角增加值[分别为(5.48±2.63)°,(9.43±3.85)°,(8.76±2.71)°]A组与B、C组之间比较差异有统计学意义。[结论]采用颈椎前路三种不同减压植骨融合术式治疗多节段颈椎病在改善神经功能上没有明显区别,但是混合式减压植骨融合术后融合率最高,多椎间隙减压和混合减压植骨融合术后颈椎曲度恢复优于长节段椎体次全切除减压术。

关键词(KeyWords)： 多节段颈椎病;前路;减压;融合

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 徐用亿;王守国;孙进;谢跃;费昊东;季峰;葛运如;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Ashkenazi E,Smorgick Y,Rand N,et al.Anterior decompression combined with corpectomies and discectomies in the management of multilevel cervical myelopathy:a hybrid decompression and fixation technique[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,3(3):205-209.
• [2]Liu Y,Hou Y,Yang L,et al.Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques in the surgical management of multilevel cervical spondyloticmyelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2012,37(23):1450-1458.
• [3]Liu T,Wen X,Tao Ch,et al.Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy,which one is better?A systematic review[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(2):224-235.
• [4]Lin QSH,Zhou XH,Wang XW,et al.A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervicalspondylotic myelopathy[J].Eur Spine J,2012,21(3):474-481.
• [5]Cabraja M,Abbushi A,Koeppen D,et al.Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy:sagittal alignment and clinical outcome[J].Neurosurg Focus,2010,28(3):15.
• [6]Woods BI,Hohl J,Lee J,et al.Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Clin Orthop,2011,469(3):688-695.
• [7]董亮,谭明生,移平,等.颈前路分节段减压植骨融合术治疗多节段颈椎病[J].中国骨伤,2014,27(12):995-999.
• [8]刘军海,陈德玉,谢宁,等.3种颈前路减压重建术式治疗多节段颈椎病[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(9):663-665.
• [9]Xu WB,Wun-Jer S,Gang L,et al.Reconstructive techniques study after anterior decompression of multilevel cervical spondyloticmyelopathy[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2009,22(7):511-515.
• [10]Cao JM,Zhang YZ,Shen Y,et al.Selection of operative approaches for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy by imageological score[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2012,25(2):99-106.
• [11]Singh K,Vaccaro AR,Kim J,et al.Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy:a biomechanical study[J].Spine,2004,29(8):845-849.
• [12]Wang JC,Mc Donough PW,Kanim LE,et al.Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J].Spine,2001,26(6):643-646.
• [13]Huang JJ,Niu CC.Anterior cervical spinal surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy[J].Chang Gung Med J,2004,27(7):531-541.
• [14]Librand AS,Fye MA,Emery SE,et al.Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2002,27(2):146-151.
• [15]Liu Y,Qi M,Chen H,et al.Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Eur Spine J,2012,21(12):2428-2435.
• [16]Khoueir P,Oh BC,DiRisio DJ,et al.Multilevel anterior cervical fusion using a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix with iliac crest bonemarrow aspirate:an 18-month follow-up study[J].Neurosurgery,2007,61(5):963-970.
• [17]袁文,徐盛明,王新伟,等.颈前路分节段减压植骨融合术治疗多节段颈椎病:3种方法移植骨融合率的比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2007,11(47):9595-9598.