两种固定方式治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的比较External fixation versus internal fixation for osteoporotic distal radius fractures in elderly
吴晓林;钟伟;梁答;马振;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]比较组合式外固定架与掌侧锁定钢板内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2013年1月~2018年1月诊治的68例老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折,其中采用闭合手法复位组合式外固定架治疗38例(外固定组),采用切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗30例(内固定组)。比较两组围手术期、随访与影像资料。[结果] 68例患者均顺利完成手术。外固定组在手术时间、术中失血量、切口总长度和住院时间方面均显著优于内固定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但外固定组术中透视次数显著多于内固定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。68例均获得随访,随访时间(14.37±1.85)个月。末次随访时两组患者ROM和Gartland-Werley评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像方面:两组患者随术后时间推移,掌倾角、尺偏角均有轻度丢失,但不同时间点间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);外固定组桡骨茎突高度的丢失不同时间点的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而内固定组桡骨茎突高度的丢失差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3、6和12个月时,外固定组的桡骨茎突高度均显著大于内固定组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]组合式外固定架治疗老年骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折操作简单、固定可靠,可同时兼顾对功能与解剖角度的恢复,尤其对于桡骨高度的恢复具有明显临床优势。
关键词(KeyWords): 骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折;老年人;外固定;内固定
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 吴晓林;钟伟;梁答;马振;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]华臻,王建伟,尹恒,等.成人桡骨远端骨折非手术治疗后桡骨短缩的相关因素[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2018, 26(16):1446-1451.
- [2]邓建海,宋晓玺,张莉,等.手法复位石膏外固定与切开复位钢板内固定治疗骨质疏松性桡骨远端骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2018, 33(11):1218-1219.
- [3]王星亮,华国军,杨家骥,等.锁定钢板内固定与外固定支架治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2018, 26(12):1074-1079.
- [4] Esposito J, Schemitsch EH, Saccone M, et al. External fixation versus open reduction with plate fixation for distal radius fractures:a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J]. Injury, 2013, 44(4):409-416.
- [5] Chaudhry H, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Mundi R, et al. Are volar locking plates superior to percutaneous K-wires for distal radius fractures? A meta-analysis[J]. Clin Orthop, 2015, 473(9):3017-3027.
- [6] Brogan DM, Richard MJ, Ruch D, et al. Management of severely comminuted distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Surg, 2015, 40(9):1905-1914.
- [7]秦泗河. Ilizarov技术概述[J].中华骨科杂志, 2006, 26(9):642-645.
- [8] Safdari M, Koohestani MM. Comparing the effect of volar plate fixators and external fixators on outcome of patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures:a clinical trial[J]. Electronic Physician,2015, 7(2):1085-1091.
- [9] Roh YH, Lee BK, Baek JR, et al. A randomized comparison of volar plate and external fixation for intra-articular distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Surg, 2015, 40(1):34-41.
- [10]董桂贤.内固定和外固定架治疗不稳定型桡骨远端骨折的近期疗效观察[J].重庆医学, 2018, 47(16):2235-2238.
- [11] Gouk CJC, Bindra RR, Tarrant DJ, et al. Volar locking plate fixation versus external fixation of distal radius fractures:a meta-analysis[J]. J Hand Surg Eur, 2018, 43(9):954-960.
- [12] Kapoor H, Agarwal A, Dhaon BK. Displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius:a comparative evaluation of results following closed reduction, external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation[J]. Injury, 2000, 31(2):75-79.
- [13] Walenkamp MM, Bentohami A, Beerekamp MS, et al. Functional outcome in patients with unstable distal radius fractures, volar locking plate versus external fixation:a meta-analysis[J]. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr, 2013, 8(2):67-75.