卢发太;杨军;王岩峰;

• 1:中国医科大学附属第一医院骨科

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]本研究通过系统回顾不同方法治疗胫骨下段骨折的英文文献,对其畸形愈合率、不愈合率、感染率、内固定失败率及二次手术率等进行评价。[方法]2位作者独立计算机检索PubMed数据库,Embase,Co-chrane library,CBM和相关的会议记录及相关文献的参考文献,检索无语种限制。筛选出符合纳入标准的文献,对其进行严格的质量评价,采用SPSS 19.0对纳入研究结果进行分析。[结果]初检获得相关文献721篇,最后纳入22篇,共1 484例。保守治疗组(n=556)的不愈合率为1.3%,明显低于髓内针固定组(RR:0.22;CI:0.01～0.71;P<0.001)的5.8%和钢板内固定组(n=310)的3.7%(RR:0.35;CI:0.01～0.91;P=0.02)。钢板内固定组的畸形愈合率为7.7%,明显低于保守治疗组的15.5%(RR:0.50;CI:0.21～0.73;P=0.001)和髓内针固定组的14.6%(RR,0.53;CI:0.23～0.77;P=0.003)。钢板固定组的二次手术率为8.1%,明显低于髓内针固定组的18.3%,(RR:0.44;CI:0.22～0.69;P<0.001)。[结论]保守治疗组的不愈合率明显低于手术治疗组,但保守治疗组的畸形愈合率明显高于钢板内固定组。钢板内固定组的畸形愈合率和二次手术率明显低于髓内针固定组。

关键词(KeyWords)： 骨折;胫骨;下段;干骺端;固定

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 辽宁省教育厅科研基金资助项目(编号:L2010687);; 中华医学会教育分会、中国高等教育学会医学教育研究课题(编号:2010-15-36)

作者(Author): 卢发太;杨军;王岩峰;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]夏洪刚,李杰,吕德成.Ⅱ-Ⅲ型Pilon骨折治疗与影响疗效因素分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17:88-90.
• [2]Borg T,Larsson S,Lindsjo U.Percutaneous plating of distal tibialfractures.Preliminary results in 21 patients[J].Injury,2004,35:608-614.
• [3]Fan CY,Chiang CC,Chuang TY,et al.Interlocking nails for dis-placed metaphyseal fractures of the distal tibia[J].Injury,2005,36:669-674.
• [4]Maffulli N,Toms AD,McMurtie A,et al.Percutaneous plating of dis-tal tibial fractures[J].Int Orthop,2004,28:159-162.
• [5]Obremskey WT,Medina M.Comparison of intramedullary nailing ofdistal third tibial shaft fractures:before and after traumatologists[J].Orthopedics,2004,27:1180-1184.
• [6]Redfern DJ,Syed SU,Davies SJ.Fractures of the distal tibia:mini-mally invasive plate osteosynthesis[J].Injury,2004,35:615-620.
• [7]Sarmiento A,Latta LL.450 closed fractures of the distal third of thetibia treated with a functional brace[J].Clin Orthop,2004,428:261-271.
• [8]Guo JJ,Tang N,Yang HL,et al.A prospective,randomised trial com-paring closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in thetreatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia[J].J Bone JointSurg Br,2010,7:984-988.
• [9]Kayali C,Agus H,Eren A,et al.How should open tibia fractures betreated?A retrospective comparative study between intramedul-larynailing and biologic plating[J].Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derq,2009,3:243-248.
• [10]Gupta RK,Rohilla RK,Sangwan K,et al.Locking plate fixation indistal metaphyseal tibial fractures:series of 79 patients[J].Int Or-thop,2010,8:1285-1290.
• [11]Beardi J,Hessmann M,Hansen M,et al.Operative treatment of tibialshaft fractures:a comparison of different methods of primary stabilisa-tion[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2008,7:709-715.
• [12]Vallier HA,Le TT,Bedi A.Radiographic and clinical comparisons ofdistal tibia shaft fractures(4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond):plat-ing versus intramedullary nailing[J].J Orthop Trauma,2008,5:307-311.
• [13]Janssen KW,Biert J,van Kampen A.Treatment of distal tibial frac-tures:plate versus nail:a retrospective outcome analysis of matchedpairs of patients[J].Int Orthop,2007,5:709-714.
• [14]Im GI,Tae SK.Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia:a prospectiverandomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versusopen reduction and plate and screws fixation[J].J Trauma,2005,5:1219-1223.