黄紫房;杨军林;林翔;李佛保;谢超凡;王其飞;

• 1:南方医科大学解剖教研室
• 2:中山大学附属第一医院脊柱侧弯中心

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]比较青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)采用后路凸侧旋棒矫形与凹侧旋棒矫形的手术效果。[方法]收集本中心2008年7月～2011年7月收治的AIS患者61例,年龄10～18岁,术前主弯均<70°。按术中矫形技术分为凸侧旋棒矫形组(n=34)和凹侧旋棒矫形组(n=27),所有患者均具有完整的术前、术后全脊柱X线片。研究收集两组患者的术前、术后主弯Cobb角及其矫正率、T5～12后凸角、顶椎偏移距离(AVT)、C7偏离骶骨中央垂线距离(C7-CSVL)和C7偏离骶骨后上角距离(C7-SSVL),置钉密度,并进行统计学比较。[结果]两组患者皆成功获得手术矫正,术中、术后无严重并发症发生;术前主弯Cobb角分别从平均47.9°±9.9°和51.4°±8.8°(P=0.148),矫正至术后平均8.2°±5.2°和14.0°±8.5°(P=0.002),平均矫正率为(82.5±10.5)%和(73.4±13.9)%(P=0.005);T5～12后凸分别从术前平均17.7°±12.2°和20.6°±13.7°(P=0.377),矫正至术后平均19.7°±9.8°和18.3°±8.7°(P=0.558);术后冠状面和矢状面皆获得良好平衡。[结论]AIS后路凸侧旋棒矫形较凹侧旋棒矫形具有更好的主弯矫正率,并可潜在增加脊髓神经安全性;两组患者术后皆能维持良好的胸椎后凸。

关键词(KeyWords)： 脊柱侧凸;矫形;凸侧;凹侧;旋棒技术

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 黄紫房;杨军林;林翔;李佛保;谢超凡;王其飞;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]Vallespir G P,Flores J B,Trigueros I S,et al.Vertebral coplanar align-ment:a standardized technique for three dimensional correction in scol-iosis surgery:technical description and preliminary results in Lenketype 1 curves[J].Spine,2008,14:1588-1597.
• [2]Qiu Y,Zhu F,Wang B,et al.Comparison of surgical outcomes of lenketype 1 idiopathic scoliosis:vertebral coplanar alignment versus derota-tion technique[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2011,8:492-499.
• [3]修鹏,宋跃明,刘浩,等.脊椎共面排列矫形技术治疗特发性脊柱侧凸的初步疗效[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,4:274-279.
• [4]Lenke LG,Betz RR,Harms J,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:anew classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis[J].J BoneJoint Surg Am,2001,83:1169-1181.
• [5]Hicks JM,Singla A,Shen FH,et al.Complications of pedicle screw fix-ation in scoliosis surgery[J].Spine,2010,11:465-470.
• [6]Gelalis ID,Paschos NK,Pakos EE,et al.Accuracy of pedicle screwplacement:a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparingfree hand,fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques[J].EurSpine J,2012,2:247-255.
• [7]O'Brien MF,Lowe TG,Lenke LG,et al.Pedicle screw vs hook fixationin the thoracic spine:clinical and biomechanical implications[R].Presented at the 8th International Meeting on Advanced Spinal Tech-niques(IMAST),Paradise Island,Bahamas,2001.
• [8]Helgeson MD,Shah SA,Newton PO,et al.Evaluation of proximal junc-tional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pediclescrew,hook,or hybrid instrumentation[J].Spine,2010,2:177-181.
• [9]Clements DH,Betz RR,Newton PO,et al.Correlation of scoliosis curvecorrection with the number and type of fixation anchors[J].Spine,2009,20:2147-2150.
• [10]Lowenstein J E,Matsumoto H,Vitale M G,et al.Coronal and sagittalplane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a comparison be-tween all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw con-structs[J].Spine,2007,4:448-452.
• [11]Mladenov KV,Vaeterlein C,Stuecker R.Selective posterior thoracic fu-sion by means of direct vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathicscoliosis:effects on the sagittal alignment[J].Eur Spine J,2011,7:1114-1117.
• [12]Hwang SW,Samdani AF,Gressot LV,et al.Effect of direct vertebralbody derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Eur Spine J,2012,1:31-39.