胸腰椎骨折长节段内固定术后脊柱旋转力线的临床观察Rotational alignment imbalance of the spine after long-segment fixation for thoracolumbar fracture
王翔;郑明辉;童凯;蔡毅;朱永健;陈建庭;瞿东滨;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]观察胸腰椎骨折经后路长节段固定术后脊柱旋转力线的恢复情况,并探讨力线失衡的原因及其临床意义。[方法]分析本院2006年1月~2015年1月收治的45例胸腰椎骨折患者,AOSpine骨折分型为A3、A4、B型,其中男27例,女18例,年龄18~62岁,平均(33.02±10.41)岁,均接受后路长节段椎弓根螺钉内固定术。在正侧位X线片上测量患者手术前后棘突旋转距离(SPRD)及伤椎侧(后)凸Cobb角,统计固定节段长度、螺钉使用总数,计算单个椎体螺钉使用个数。根据术后脊柱旋转力线恢复情况,将患者分为力线良好组和力线失衡组。通过比较两组手术前后的测量指标,探讨力线失衡的原因及其临床意义。[结果]45例患者中,旋转力线良好者占32例(71.11%),旋转力线失衡者占13例(28.89%)。两组术前SPRD比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1周及末次随访时,失衡组患者SPRD明显大于良好组(P<0.05)。两组固定节段长度和螺钉使用总数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而单个椎体螺钉个数,失衡组(1.37±0.32)个,明显少于良好组的(1.71±0.29)个(P<0.01)。[结论]后路胸腰椎长节段内固定能有效复位骨折椎体,恢复脊柱的生物力学特性;但部分患者术后存在脊柱旋转力线失衡的情况,与螺钉固定情况、手术技巧等方面密切相关,对术后脊柱稳定性有重要意义。
关键词(KeyWords): 胸腰椎骨折;长节段固定;旋转力线;螺钉数目;脊柱稳定
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 王翔;郑明辉;童凯;蔡毅;朱永健;陈建庭;瞿东滨;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Zaryanov AV,Park DK,Khalil JG,et al.Cement augmentation in vertebral burst fractures[J].Neurosurg Focus,2014,37(1):1-7.
- [2]Müller U,Berlemann U,Sledge J,et al.Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation:bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion[J].Eur Spine J,1999,8(4):284-289.
- [3]Norton RP,Milne EL,Kaimrajh DN,et al.Biomechanical analysis of four-versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures[J].Spine J,2014,8:1734-1739.
- [4]An HS,Singh K,Vaccaro AR,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model[J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),2004,29(3):257-262.
- [5]Schmidt OI,Gahr RH,Gosse A,et al.ATLS(R)and damage control in spine trauma[J].World J Emerg Surg,2009,4(9):1-11.
- [6]Medici A,Meccariello L,Falzarano G.Non-operative Vs.percutaneous stabilization in magerl’S A1 Or A2 thoracolumbar spine fracture in adults:is it really advantageous for a good alignment of the spine?preliminary data from a prospective study[J].Eur Spine J,2014,23(6):677-683.
- [7]王翔,瞿东滨,蔡毅,等.胸腰椎骨折内固定术后伤椎椎体中央高度恢复的影像学研究及临床意义[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2016,12(12):1087-1092.
- [8]Danisa OA,Shaffrey CI,Jane JA,et al.Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures:a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes[J].J Neurosurg,1995,83(6):977-983.
- [9]Scheer J,Bakhsheshian J,Fakurnejad S,et al.Evidence-based medicine of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures:a systematic review of operative management across 20 years[M].Global Spine J,2015,5(1):73-82.
- [10]Mc Lain RF,Sparling E,Benson DR.Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures.a preliminary report[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993,75(2):162-167.
- [11]Viljoen SV,De Vries Watson NA,Grosland NM,et al.Biomechanical analysis of anterior versus posterior instrumentation following a thoracolumbar corpectomy[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2014,21(4):577-581.
- [12]王洪伟,李长青,周跃,等.伤椎置钉技术治疗胸腰椎骨折的生物力学及临床随访研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(16):1356-1360.
- [13]Li Q,Yun C,Li S.Transpedicular bone grafting and pedicle screw fixation in injured vertebrae using a paraspinal approach for thoracolumbar fractures:a retrospective study[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2016,11(1):115-120.
- [14]范志丹,夏虹,昌耘冰,等.伤椎传统短节段椎弓根螺钉固定与附加椎弓根螺钉固定后椎体生物力学稳定性的比较[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(26):5011-5014.
- [15]Tan CE,Fok MW,Luk KD,et al.Insertional torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning:a porcine study[J].J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong),2014,2:224-227.
- [16]Bühler DW,Berlemann U,Oxland TR,et al.Moments and forces during pedicle screw insertion.In vitro and in vivo measurements[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1998,23(11):1220-1227.
- [17]Dick JC,Jones MP,Zdeblick TA,et al.A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation[J].J Spinal Disord,1994,7(5):402-407.
- [18]胥少汀.临床脊柱不稳定[J].中华骨科杂志,1998,18(12):758-760.2017-03-30 2017-04-21