零切迹椎间融合器治疗多节段伴后凸畸形颈椎病Evaluation of ACDF with Zero-p in treating multiple-level cervical spondylosis(MCS) with cervical kyphosis
张在恒;张祥英;张元豫;颜登鲁;厉玉杰;张科;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]评价颈前路零切迹椎间融合器(Zero-profile interbody fusion device,Zero-P)治疗多节段颈椎病伴后凸畸形的临床疗效,探讨其对颈椎后凸畸形矫形的影响。[方法]2012年8月~2015年3月,26例多节段颈椎病患者均行颈椎间隙减压后Zero-P系统固定。比较术前、术后1个月及末次随访患者的X线片、MRI或CT,根据颈椎Cobb角、椎间高度等指标的变化情况,评价零切迹椎间融合器的矫形效果;分析JOA评分、VAS评分、NDI指数,对该术式的临床效果进行评价。[结果]所有患者均获得16~33个月的随访,平均22.7个月。26例患者术后主要症状均明显减轻,无严重术后并发症出现,并随着术后时间的延长症状改善愈发明显甚至消失;患者JOA评分、VAS评分、NDI指数术前分别为:(9.37±0.99)分、(6.70±0.55)分、(23.48±2.39)%,末次随访时分别为:(14.18±1.03)分、(2.02±0.37)分、(10.10±1.67)%;颈椎Cobb角:术前(-2.26±1.04)°,末次随访(14.73±1.00)°;颈椎椎间高度:术前(4.16±0.54)mm,末次随访(7.42±0.88)mm;患者JOA评分、VAS评分、NDI指数、颈椎Cobb角及椎间高度术后均较术前有明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]对于伴有后弓畸形的多节段颈椎病患者行颈椎前路减压Zero-P固定可以达到良好的近期治疗效果。
关键词(KeyWords): 多节段颈椎病;颈前路减压植骨融合术;零切迹系统;颈椎后凸畸形
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 张在恒;张祥英;张元豫;颜登鲁;厉玉杰;张科;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Hillard VH,Apfelbaum RI.Surgical management of cervical myelopathy:indications and techniques for multilevel cervical discectomy[J].Spine J,2006,6(6 Suppl):242-251.
- [2]Chang SW,Kakarla UK,Maughan PH,et al.Four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation:radiographic and clinical results[J].Neurosurgery,2010,66(4):639-647.
- [3]Fraser JF,Hartl R.Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine:a meta analysis of fusion rates[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2007,6(4):298-303.
- [4]Fountas KN,Kapsalaki EZ,Nikolakakos LG,et al.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications[J].Spine J,2006,6(5):2310-2317.
- [5]Scholz M,Schnake KJ,Pingel A,et al.A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion[J].Clin Orthop,2011,469(469):666-673.
- [6]Barbagallo GM,Romano D,Certo F,et al.Zero-P:a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF.A single Institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices[J].Eur Spine J,2013,22(6):868-878.
- [7]Chen Y,Chen HJ.Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy:a three-year follow-up[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2016,144(1):72-76.
- [8]Liu T,Xu W,Cheng T,et al.Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy,which one is better?A systematic review[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(2):224-235.
- [9]Feizerfan I,Klopfenstein JD,Bambakidis NC,et al.Surgical management of cervical disc disease:from no fusion to fusion and back again[J].Clin Neurosurg,2005,52:331-337.
- [10]Cho HJ,Hur JW,Lee J B,et al.Cervical stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage versus zero-profile anchored spacer in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:minimum 2-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcome[J].J Kor Neurosurg Soc,2015,58(2):119-124.
- [11]Innocent N,Marjan A,Leng LZ,et al.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device:a clinical and radiological study:clinical article[J].Am Assoc Neurol Surg,2014,21(4):529-537.
- [12]Chong E,Pelletier MH,Mobbs RJ,et al.The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion:a systematic review[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2015,16(1):99.
- [13]Lee MJ,Bazaz R,Furey CG,et al.Influence of anterior cervical plate design on dysphagia:a 2-year prospective longitudinal follow-up study[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18(5):406-409.
- [14]Fogel GR,Mc Donnell MF.Surgical treatment of dysphagia after anterior cervical interbody fusion[J].Spine J,2005,5(2):140-144.
- [15]Joaquim AF,Murar J,Savage JW,et al.Dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery:a systematic review of potential preventative measures[J].Spine J,2014,14(9):2246-2260.
- [16]Yang H,Chen D,Wang X,et al.Zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device reduces rate of adjacent-level ossification development and dysphagia compared to ACDF with plating and cage system[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135(6):781-787.
- [17]Park MS,Kelly MP,Lee DH,et al.Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis[J].Spine J,2014,14(7):1228-1234.
- [18]Finn MA,Bradke DS,Daubs M,et al.Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty[J].Eur Spine J,2009,18(10):1520-1527.
- [19]Zhou J,Li X,Dong J,et al.Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages[J].J Clin Neurosci,2011,18(11):1505-1509.