王星亮;华国军;杨家骥;徐志庆;王小龙;刘云鹏;

• 1:解放军第101医院骨科

摘要(Abstract)：

[目的]比较切开复位锁定钢板内固定(LCP)和闭合复位外固定支架(EF)治疗C型桡骨远端骨折的临床疗效。[方法]回顾2014年1月~2016年6月本院同一手术组收治并手术的78例C型桡骨远端骨折患者资料。锁定钢板内固定(LCP)组40例,其中男24例,女16例,年龄34~74岁,平均(57.41±3.31)岁;外固定支架(EF)组38例,其中男性20例,女性18例,年龄35~72岁,平均(56.32±2.51)岁。采用改良Mayo功能评分和影像测量,包括桡骨远端的尺偏角、掌倾角和桡骨高度,评价比较两种手术方法的优劣。[结果]两组患者均顺利接受手术,无血管神经损伤等严重并发症。LCP组手术切口长度、术中失血量明显大于EF组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者均获随访,平均随访时间(11.55±1.38)个月。末次随访时,Mayo功能评分LCP组(86.13±9.73)分,EF组(84.18±8.44)分,两组间差异无统计学意义(t=1.993,P=0.08)。在术后即刻、术后6周、术后3个月的影像测量方面,LCP组的掌倾角、尺偏角和桡骨茎突高度均大于EF组。[结论]LCP和EF治疗桡骨远端C型骨折均可取得满意的临床疗效,但LCP在维持桡骨高度和尺偏角方面具有更好的优势。

关键词(KeyWords)： 锁定钢板内固定;外固定;桡骨远端骨折

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 王星亮;华国军;杨家骥;徐志庆;王小龙;刘云鹏;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]金粉勤,薛锋,徐雪荣,等.外固定支架与钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定型骨折的疗效对比[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2013,15(1):87-89.
• [2]Chaudhry H,Kleinlugtenbelt YV,Mundi R,et al.Are volar locking plates superior to percutaneous k-wires for distal radius fractures?A meta-analysis[J].Clin Orthop,2015,473(9):3017-3027.
• [3]周孜辉,高伟,王秋根,等.外固定支架与锁定加压钢板治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的比较研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(2):89-91.
• [4]Whiting PS,Rice CD,Avilucea FR,et al.Patients at increased risk of major adverse events following operative treatment of distal radius fractures:inpatient versus outpatient[J].J Wrist Surg,2017,6(3):220-226.
• [5]Chen CH,Zhou RK,Zhen HQ,et al.Efficacy of volar and dorsal plate fixation[J].Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(3):4375-4380.
• [6]Omokawa S,Abe Y,Imatani J,et al.Treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures[J].Hand Clin,2017,33(3):529-543.
• [7]Kumbaraci M,Kucuk L,Karapinar L,et al.Retrospective comparison of external fixation versus volar locking plate in the treatment of unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2014,24(2):173-178.
• [8]Baratz ME,Des Jardins JD,Anderson DD,et al.Displaced intraarticular fractures of the distal radius:the effect of fracture displacement on contact stresses in a cadaver model[J].J Hand Surg Am,1996,21(2):183-188.
• [9]Bini A,Surace MF,Pilato G.Complex articular fractures of the distal radius:the role of closed reduction and external fixation[J].J Hand Surg Eur,2008,33(3):305-310.
• [10]Kapoor H,Agarwal A,Dhaon BK.Displaced intra-articular fractures of distal radius:a comparative evaluation of results following closed reduction,external fixation and open reduction with internal fixation[J].Injury,2000,31(2):75-79.
• [11]Walenkamp MM,Bentohami A,Beerekamp MS,et al.Functional outcome in patients with unstable distal radius fractures,volar locking plate versus external fixation:a meta-analysis[J].Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr,2013,8(2):67-75.
• [12]Safdari M,Koohestani MM.Comparing the effect of volar plate fixators and external fixators on outcome of patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures:a clinical trial[J].Electronic Physician,2015,7(2):1085-1091.
• [13]Roh YH,Lee BK,Baek JR,et al.A randomized comparison of volar plate and external fixation for intra-articular distal radius frac-tures[J].J Hand Surg Am,2015,40(1):34-41.
• [14]Geller L,Bernstein M,Carli A,et al.Efficacy of different fixation devices in maintaining an initial reduction for surgically managed distal radius fractures[J].Can J Surg,2009,52(5):E161-E166.