椎体次全切时两种开槽宽度对脊髓型颈椎病的近期疗效分析Short-term efficacy of two slot widths in vertebra corpectomy for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
周涛;林浩;李健;林昊;陈小强;何仿;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]探讨分析颈椎前路椎体次全切植骨融合内固定术(ACCF)时使用两种不同开槽减压宽度对脊髓型颈椎病的近期治疗效果。[方法]回归性分析2012年12月~2015年1月在本院行ACCF手术的66例患者的临床效果。其中椎体次全切时采用1.4 cm开槽减压宽度治疗脊髓型颈椎病31例(1.4 cm组),在椎体次全切时采用1.0cm开槽减压宽度治疗脊髓型颈椎病35例(1.0 cm组)。将手术时间、失血量、融合节段前突角(SL)、手术并发症、术前及术后6个月JOA评分、椎体融合率进行统计学分析。[结果]所有患者随访3年。1.4 cm组手术并发症发生率为3.2%,1.0 cm组手术并发症发生率为5.7%,手术并发症发生率两组差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。尽管1.4cm组和1.0 cm组患者术前JOA评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.858),但术后6个月1.4 cm组患者平均JOA评分显著高于1.0 cm组患者(P=0.01)。1.4 cm组平均失血量和手术时间显著高于1.0 cm组(P<0.01)。根据影像学评估,1.4 cm组术后融合节段前凸角改善显著高于1.0 cm组(P<0.01)。两组患者术后第12周融合率差异无统计学意义(P=0.294)。[结论]ACCF手术时,开槽减压宽度为1.4cm在神经功能恢复、融合节段前凸角比开槽减压宽度为1.0cm有更好的改善,但手术时间延长和失血量增加。
关键词(KeyWords): 椎体次全切;开槽宽度;近期疗效
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 周涛;林浩;李健;林昊;陈小强;何仿;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Fehlings MG,Barry S,Kopjar B,et al.Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy:outcomes of the prospective multicenter AO Spine North America CSM study in 264 patients[J].Spine,2013,38(26):2247–2252.
- [2]Praveen VM,Michael GK,Paul GM,et al.Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2009,11(2):130–141.
- [3]Bednarik J,Kadanka Z,Dusek L,et al.Presymptomaticspondylotic cervical cord compression[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2004,29(20):2260-2269.
- [4]Lenehan B,Boran S,Street J,et al.Demographics of acute admissions to a National Spinal Injuries Unit[J].Eur Spine J,2009,18(7):938-942.
- [5]Matsunaga S,Sakou T,Taketomi E,et al.Clinical course of patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament:a minimum 10-year cohort study[J].J Neurosurg,2004,100(3 Suppl Spine):245-248.
- [6]Kanchiku T,Taguchi T,Kaneko K,et al.A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(13):E294-E299.
- [7]Majd ME,Vadhva M,Holt RT.Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cage with anterior plating[J].Spine,1999,24(15):1604–1610.
- [8]Riew KD,Rhee JM.The use of titanium mesh cages in the cervical spine.[J].Clin Orthop,2002,394(394):47–54.
- [9]Chuang HC,Cho DY,Chang CS,et al.Efficacy and safety of the use of titanium mesh cages and anterior cervical plates for interbody fusion after anterior cervical corpectomy[J].Surg Neurol,2006,65(5):464–471.
- [10]何仿,田纪伟,林昊,等.下颈椎骨折脱位手术方式的初步探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(20):1524-1526.
- [11]Okada Y J,Ikata T,Yamada H,et al.Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy[J].Spine,1993,18(14):2024-2029.