前后路手术治疗矢状序列异常的脊髓型颈椎病疗效比较和预后评估Anterior versus posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy:clinical outcomes evaluation in a retrospective study
王琨;杨操;杨述华;郜勇;李帅;刘伟;张正东;李志良;宋雨;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]对比前后路两种手术方式治疗矢状序列异常的脊髓型颈椎病的疗效,探讨影响脊髓型颈椎病预后的相关因素。[方法]对2009~2012年收治的脊髓型颈椎病患者89例进行回顾性研究。53例患者纳入本次研究。其中前路手术31例,后路手术22例,采用改良的日本骨科协会(m JOA)评分法评估脊髓型颈椎病手术疗效,颈椎功能障碍指数(NDI)进行颈椎功能的评价。随访时间12~35个月,平均16.5个月。影像学评估指标包括颈椎(C_(2~7))Cobb角,脊髓横截面积。[结果]前路手术组术后JOA评分较后路手术组高,差异有统计学意义(P=0.048),末次随访差异消除(P=0.31),前路手术组与后路手术组术后NDI评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.32),随访中也是如此(P=0.21)。前路手术组中立位术后Cobb角较后路手术组大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),在随访中结果也是如此(P=0.021)。前路手术组得分较后路手术组脊髓横截面积更大(P=0.039)。术前Cobb角与术前JOA评分没有相关性(P=0.32),术前Cobb角与术前椎管横截面积没有相关性(P=0.20)。[结论]前路减压植骨融合内固定术、后路单开门椎管成形术治疗矢状面序列异常的脊髓型颈椎病患者疗效满意,随访疗效没有差异,尚没有有效方法能评估脊髓型颈椎病患者预后。
关键词(KeyWords): 脊髓型颈椎病;前路减压融合术;椎管成形术;临床疗效
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 王琨;杨操;杨述华;郜勇;李帅;刘伟;张正东;李志良;宋雨;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Kamata M,Hirabayashi K,Satomi K,et al.Postoperative spinal deformity by posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].East Jpn J Clin Orthop,1990,2(1):86-89.
- [2]Hirabayashi K,Miyakawa J,Satomi K,et al.Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament[J].Spine,1981,6(4):354-364.
- [3]Vernon H,Mior S.The Neck Disability Index:a study of reliability and validity[J].J Manipulative Physiol Ther,1991,14(7):409-415.
- [4]Suri A,Chabbra RP,Mehta VS,et al.Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine J,2003,3(1):33-45.
- [5]Suda K,Abumi K,Ito M,et al.Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine,2003,28(12):1258-1262.
- [6]Kim SW,Hai DM,Sundaram S,et al.Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty[J].Spine J,2013,13(8):914-921.
- [7]Kaptain GJ,Simmons NE,Replogle RE,et al.Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].J Neurosurg,2000,93(2 Suppl):199-204.
- [8]Smith JS,Lafage V,Ryan DJ,et al.Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume:analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AO Spine North America Myelopathy study[J].Spine,2013,38(22 Suppl):161-170.
- [9]Oshima Y,Seichi A,Takeshita K,et al.Natural course and prognostic factors in patients with mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy with increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging[J].Spine,2012,37(22):1909-1913.
- [10]Takashi T,Takashi H,Toshitaka Y,et al.Modifi ed k-line in magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinical outcome in patients with nonlordotic alignment after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J].Spine,2014,39(21):1261-1268.
- [11]Smith JS,Shaffrey CI,Lafage V,et al.Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2012,17(4):300-307.