3D打印辅助手术与传统手术治疗Pilon骨折疗效比较的荟萃分析3D print-assisted versus conventional surgery for Pilon fractures:a meta-analysis
白建中;王永祥;王静成;张佩;梁远;吴志朋;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]系统评价3D打印辅助手术和传统手术在治疗Pilon骨折中的疗效。[方法]计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CNKI、CBM、WanFang等中外数据库,至2018年5月1日。两位作者分别进行文献搜集、筛选、质量评估、数据提取,存在争议时,通过讨论解决。[结果]共5篇RCTs符合纳入标准,包含319例患者,其中158例患者采用3D打印辅助手术,161例行传统手术。Meta分析结果显示:3D打印辅助手术手术时间[MD=-21.72,95%CI (-28.49,-14.95),P<0.05]、失血量[MD=-76.17,95%CI (-103.95,-48.40),P<0.05]、术后功能恢复[MD=7.59, 95%CI (2.21,12.97),P<0.05]、术后疼痛[MD=-0.59,95%CI (-1.18,-0.01), P<0.05]、优良率[RR=1.16,95%CI (1.04,1.29),P<0.05]、解剖复位率[RR=1.32,95%CI (1.12,1.55),P<0.05]明显优于传统手术方式。在骨折愈合时间[MD=-1.06,95%CI (-2.53,0.41),P>0.05]和感染率[RR=0.51,95%CI (0.20,1.31),P>0.05]方面,两者无显著差别。[结论] Meta分析结果表明3D打印辅助手术手术时间、失血量、术后功能恢复、术后疼痛、优良率及解剖复位率明显优于传统手术方式。对于复杂的Pilon骨折,我们常规推荐使用3D打印辅助手术。
关键词(KeyWords): Pilon骨折;3D打印辅助手术;传统手术;荟萃分析
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81772332)
作者(Author): 白建中;王永祥;王静成;张佩;梁远;吴志朋;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1] Bacon S, Smith WR, Morgan SJ, et al. A retrospective analysis of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the tibial plafond:open reduction and internal fixation versus external Ilizarov fixation[J].Injury, 2008, 39(2):196-202.
- [2] d'Heurle A, Kazemi N, Connelly C, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of locked plates versus nonlocked plates for the treatment of high-energy pilon fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015,29(9):420-423.
- [3] Patterson MJ, Cole JD. Two-staged delayed open reduction and internal fixation of severe pilon fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma,1999,13(2):85-91.
- [4]黄洪,储辉,俞航,等.影响胫骨Pilon骨折疗效的相关因素分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2012,(6):490-494.
- [5] Davidovitch RI, Weil Y, Karia R, et al. Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction:three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging.[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(20):1838-1843.
- [6] Chana-Rodriguez F, Mananes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, et al. 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures.[J].Injury, 2016, 47(11):2507-2511.
- [7] Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis[J]. Statistics Med, 2002, 21(11):1539-1558.
- [8] Zheng W, Chen C, Zhang C, et al. The Feasibility of 3D printing technology on the treatment of pilon fracture and its effect on doctor-patient communication[J]. BioMed Res Int, 2018, 2018:8054698.
- [9]李岩,袁志.3D打印成型技术在复杂pilon骨折中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2016,(1):42-46.
- [10]唐盛辉,孙永建,赵汉民,等.3D打印技术辅助治疗高能量Pilon骨折的临床应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2015,(22):2042-2046.
- [11]林景波,李诗,陈志刚,等. 3D打印技术在应用于Pilon骨折治疗的效果[J].河南外科学杂志, 2017,(6):48-50.
- [12]顾浩,张勇,吕晓峰,等.3D打印技术在胫骨PILON骨折中的应用[J].中国伤残医学, 2017,(24):8-10
- [13] Vidyadhara S, Rao SK. Ilizarov treatment of complex tibial pilon fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2006, 30(2):113-117.
- [14] Ruedi T. Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle joint:results 9 years after open reduction and internal fixation[J]. Injury, 1973, 5(2):130-134.
- [15] Won SH, Lee YK, Ha YC et al., Improving pre-operative planning for complex total hip replacement with a Rapid Prototype model enabling surgical simulation[J]. Bone Joint J, 2013:1458-1463.
- [16] Wang X, Wei Z, Huang J, et al. Preliminary application of virtual preoperative reconstruction planning in pilon fractures[J]. Chin J Repar Reconstr Surg, 2016, 30(1):44-49.