腰椎融合联合邻近节段K-Rod动态固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病Spinal fusion combined with dynamic stabilization fixation of the adjacent- segment with K-Rod system for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
方明;陆建猛;俞武良;韦勇力;王兴武;欧阳甲;
摘要(Abstract):
[目的]观察单节段腰椎后路椎间融合联合邻近节段K-Rod动态固定术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。[方法]回顾性分析2010年6月~2012年9月手术治疗的50例腰椎退行性疾病患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为2组:单节段腰椎后路融合联合邻近节段K-Rod动态固定术组(A组)和单节段腰椎后路融合术组(B组),其中A组男14例,女11例;平均年龄(41.2±5.6)岁;B组男12例,女13例;平均年龄(47.4±5.2)岁。评估两组患者的神经改善情况、腰椎总活动度、近端邻近节段活动度及椎间隙高度情况。[结果]随访时间12~25个月,平均16.7个月。无不可逆性神经症状加重、内置物失败等并发症,临床疗效满意。在末次随访时,两组患者术后VAS及ODI评分均获得显著改善(P<0.05);A组动态固定节段的活动度术前(8.50±0.76)°,末次随访(3.45±0.49)°,存在统计学差异(P<0.05);A组动态固定节段的近端临近节段的活动度术前(7.62±0.50)°,末次随访(7.87±0.62)°,无统计学差异;B组近端临近节段活动度术前(8.20±1.13)°,末次随访(8.90±1.03)°,存在统计学差异(P<0.05);在末次随访时,两组腰椎总活动度及椎间隙高度均无统计学差异(p>0.05)。[结论]腰椎后路融合联合邻近节段K-Rod动态固定术治疗腰椎退行性疾病早期疗效明确,能够维持一定的脊柱生物学功能,并能避免相邻节段退变的进展,但远期疗效有待进一步观察。
关键词(KeyWords): 腰椎;退行性疾病;脊柱融合术;动态固定
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author): 方明;陆建猛;俞武良;韦勇力;王兴武;欧阳甲;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References):
- [1]Cheh G,Bridwell KH,Lenke LG,et al.Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation:a minimum 5-year follow-up[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,20:2253-2257.
- [2]Schnake KJ,Schaeren S,Jeanneret B.Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,4:442-449.
- [3]俞兴,徐林,毕连涌,等.棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病初期效果分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,23:1786-1788.
- [4]Highsmith JM,Tumialan LM,Rodts GE Jr.Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization[J].Neurosurg Focus,2007,22:11.
- [5]Cheh G,Bridwell KH,Lenke LG,et al.Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation:a minimum 5-year follow-up[J].Spine,2007,32:2253-2257.
- [6]陈博来,许鸿智,林颖,等.动态稳定系统治疗腰椎退行性疾病初期疗效报道[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,7:537-540.
- [7]Putzier M,Schneider SV,Funk JF,et al.The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse:nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone[J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),2005,30:109-114.
- [8]Kanayama M,Hashimoto T,Shigenobu K,et al.A minimum 10-year follow-up of posterior dynamic stabilization using Graf artificial ligament[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32:1992-1996.
- [9]Rohlmann A,Burra NK,Zander T,et al.Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine:a finite element analysis[J].Eur Spine J,2007,16:1223-1231.
- [10]Cheng BC,Gordon J,Cheng J,et al.Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32:2551-2557.
- [11]Schmoelz W,Huber JF,Nydegger T,et al.Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc:an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure[J].Eur Spine J,2006,15:1276-1285.
- [12]邸宁,王浩明,李瀚卿,等.K-Rod动态固定治疗腰椎间盘突出症39例报告[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2013,6:322-327.
- [13]Beastall J,Karadimas E,Siddiqui M,et al.The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system:a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32:685-690.
- [14]Niosi CA,Zhu QA,Wilson DC,et al.Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system:an in vitro study[J].Eur Spine J,2006,15:913-922.